Skip to main content
Log in

International consensus on the non-pharmacological and non-surgical management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 10 April 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Summary/Rationale

We identified a knowledge gap in the non-pharmacological and non-surgical management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Main results

This international consensus process established multidisciplinary biopsychosocial recommendations on pain, nutrition, safe movement, and exercise for individuals with acute and chronic vertebral fractures.

Significance

These recommendations will guide clinical practice and inform interventions for future research.

Purpose

To establish international consensus on recommendations for the non-pharmacological and non-surgical management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Methods

We adopted a five-step modified Delphi consensus process: (1) literature search and content analysis, (2) creation of the survey, (3) selection of the expert panel, (4) first round of the rating process, and (5) second round of the rating process. The first round included 49 statements and eight open-ended questions; the second round included 30 statements. Panelists were asked to rate their agreement with each of the statements using a 9-point scale, with the option to provide further comments. Consensus for each statement was determined by counting the number of panelists whose rating was outside the 3-point region containing the median.

Results

We invited 76 people with degree in medicine, physiotherapy, kinesiology, and experience in the management of osteoporotic vertebral; 31 (41%) and 27 (36%) experts agreed to participate to the first and the second round, respectively. The mean percentage agreement after the first and second rounds was 76.6% ± 16.0% and 90.7% ± 6.5%, respectively. We established consensus on recommendations on pain, early satiety, weight loss, bracing, safe movement, and exercise for individuals with acute and chronic vertebral fractures.

Conclusion

Our international consensus provides multidisciplinary biopsychosocial recommendations to guide the management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures and inform interventions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data being reported are accurate and are coming from the official source.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Change history

References

  1. Nevitt MC (1998) The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med 128:793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ettinger B et al (2009) Contribution of vertebral deformities to chronic back pain and disability. J Bone Miner Res 7:449–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Griffith JF (2015) Identifying osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Quant Imaging Med Surg 5:11

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fink HA et al (2003) Disability after clinical fracture in postmenopausal women with low bone density: the fracture intervention trial (FIT). Osteoporos Int 14:69–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, Jacobsen SJ, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ (1993) Population-based study of survival after osteoporotic fractures. Am J Epidemiol 137:1001–1005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lindsay R (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 285:320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Ensrud KC, Scott JC, Black D (2000) Risk of mortality following clinical fractures. Osteoporos Int 11:556–561

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Milne JS, Lauder IJ (1976) The relationship of kyphosis to the shape of vertebral bodies. Ann Hum Biol 3:173–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ross PD (1997) Clinical consequences of vertebral fractures. Am J Med 103:S30–S43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goh S, Price RI, Leedman PJ, Singer KP (1999) The relative influence of vertebral body and intervertebral disc shape on thoracic kyphosis. Clin Biomech 14:439–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonner FJ Jr et al (2003) Health professional’s guide to rehabilitation of the patient with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 14:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Giangregorio LM et al (2015) Too Fit To Fracture: outcomes of a Delphi consensus process on physical activity and exercise recommendations for adults with osteoporosis with or without vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 26:891–910

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ebeling PR et al (2019) The efficacy and safety of vertebral augmentation: a second ASBMR Task Force Report. J Bone Miner Res 34:3–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gibbs JC et al (2019) Exercise for improving outcomes after osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008618.pub3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Papaioannou A et al (2003) Efficacy of home-based exercise for improving quality of life among elderly women with symptomatic osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 14:677–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Katzman WB et al (2017) Targeted spine strengthening exercise and posture training program to reduce hyperkyphosis in older adults: results from the study of hyperkyphosis, exercise, and function (SHEAF) randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 28:2831–2841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Stanghelle B et al (2020) Effects of a resistance and balance exercise programme on physical fitness, health-related quality of life and fear of falling in older women with osteoporosis and vertebral fracture: a randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 31:1069–1078

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gibbs JC et al (2020) The effects of home exercise in older women with vertebral fractures: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther 100:662–676

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ponzano M, Tibert N, Bansal S, Katzman W, Giangregorio L (2021) Exercise for improving age-related hyperkyphosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis with GRADE assessment. Arch Osteoporos 16:140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ponzano M et al (2021) Progressive resistance training for improving health-related outcomes in people at risk of fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 101:pzaa221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abenhaim L et al (2000) The role of activity in the therapeutic management of back pain: report of the International Paris Task Force on Back Pain. Spine 25:1S-33S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chilibeck PD, Vatanparast H, Cornish SM, Abeysekara S, Charlesworth S (2011) Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity: arthritis, osteoporosis, and low back pain 1 This paper is one of a selection of papers published in the Special Issue entitled Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer-review process. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 36:S49–S79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Negrini S et al (2006) Diagnostic therapeutic flow-charts for low back pain patients: the Italian clinical guidelines. Eur Medicophysica 42:151–170

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA, for the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians (2017) Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 166:514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Giangregorio LM et al (2014) Too Fit To Fracture: exercise recommendations for individuals with osteoporosis or osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 25:821–835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Rodrigues IB et al (2019) How exercise professionals support individuals with acute vertebral fractures 34:252

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bernstein S, Aguilar MD, Burnand B, Lacalle J (2001) The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1269.html

  28. Peckett KH, Ponzano M, Steinke A, Giangregorio LM (2023) Bracing and taping interventions for individuals with vertebral fragility fractures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with GRADE assessment. Arch Osteop 18:36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-023-01224-y

  29. Barker KL et al (2020) Physiotherapy rehabilitation for osteoporotic vertebral fracture—a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation (PROVE trial). Osteoporos Int 31:277–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bennell KL et al (2010) Effects of an exercise and manual therapy program on physical impairments, function and quality-of-life in people with osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a randomised, single-blind controlled pilot trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:36

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Çergel Y, Topuz O, Alkan H, Sarsan A, Sabir AN (2019) The effects of short-term back extensor strength training in postmenopausal osteoporotic women with vertebral fractures: comparison of supervised and home exercise program. Arch Osteoporos 14:82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Katzman WB et al (2016) Study of hyperkyphosis, exercise and function (SHEAF) protocol of a randomized controlled trial of multimodal spine-strengthening exercise in older adults with hyperkyphosis. Phys Ther 96:371–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Giangregorio LM et al (2014) Build better bones with exercise: protocol for a feasibility study of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 12 months of home exercise in women with a vertebral fracture. Phys Ther 94:1337–1352

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Krippendorff K (2019) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, 4th edn. SAGE Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA

  35. Tibert N, Ponzano M, Brien S, Funnell L, Gibbs JC, Jain R, Keller H, Laprade J, Morin SN, Papaioannou A, Weston Z, Wideman TH, Giangregorio L (2022) Non-pharmacological management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: patient perspectives and experiences. Clin Rehabil. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155221144370

  36. Tibert N et al (2021) Non-pharmacological management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a qualitative analysis of health-care professional perspectives and experiences. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON

  37. Dietitian of Canada (2018) Dietitians in primary health care: a pan-Canadian environmental scan. Available at: https://www.dietitians.ca/DietitiansOfCanada/media/Documents/Resources/2018-Executive-Summary-Dietitians-in-Primary-Health-Care-A-Pan-Canadian-Environmental-Scan.pdf. Accessed 7 Feb 2023

  38. Papaioannou A et al (2010) 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. Can Med Assoc J 182:1864–1873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Montero-Odasso M et al (2022) World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative. Age Ageing 51:afac205

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Tricco AC et al (2017) Comparisons of interventions for preventing falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 318:1687

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. McArthur C et al (2021) The association between trunk muscle endurance, balance and falls self-efficacy in women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: an exploratory analysis from a pilot randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil 43:2268–2274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Arnold CM, Busch AJ, Schachter CL, Harrison L, Olszynski W (2005) The relationship of intrinsic fall risk factors to a recent history of falling in older women with osteoporosis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 35:452–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dargent-Molina P et al (1996) Fall-related factors and risk of hip fracture: the EPIDOS prospective study. The Lancet 348:145–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Sherrington C et al (2019) Exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD012424

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hoffmann I et al (2022) Exercise reduces the number of overall and major osteoporotic fractures in adults. does supervision make a difference? Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. J Bone Miner Res. jbmr.4683, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4683

  46. Bonjour J-P (2005) Dietary protein: an essential nutrient for bone health. J Am Coll Nutr 24:526S-536S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sahni S et al (2010) Protective effect of high protein and calcium intake on the risk of hip fracture in the Framingham offspring cohort. J Bone Miner Res 25:2770–2776

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Sahni S, Mangano KM, McLean RR, Hannan MT, Kiel DP (2015) Dietary approaches for bone health: lessons from the Framingham osteoporosis study. Curr Osteoporos Rep 13:245–255

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Pamuk ER, Williamson DF, Serdula MK, Madans J, Byers TE (1993) Weight loss and subsequent death in a cohort of U.S. adults. Ann Intern Med. 119:744–748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Launer LJ (1994) Body mass index, weight change, and risk of mobility disability in middle-aged and older women: the epidemiologic follow-up study of NHANES I. JAMA 271:1093

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wallace JI, Schwartz RS (1997) Involuntary weight loss in elderly outpatients: recognition, etiologies, and treatment. Clin Geriatr Med 13:717–735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Harrison MB, Légaré F, Graham ID, Fervers B (2010) Adapting clinical practice guidelines to local context and assessing barriers to their use. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J J Assoc Medicale Can. 182:E78-84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID (2013) Knowledge translation in health care: moving from evidence to practice, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, UK

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the panelists who participated to the rating process. The following provided consent to be mentioned as contributors (listed in alphabetical order by first name): Amanda Isaac, MBChB, MRCS, FRCR, Consultant Musculoskeletal and Spine Radiologist, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, England; Andrew Briggs, PhD FACP, Professor, Curtin University, Perth, Australia; Anette Ranhoff, MD PhD, Professor, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Belinda Beck, PhD, Professor, Griffith University, Gold Coast & The Bone Clinic, Brisbane, Australia; Bonny O’Hare, BScPT, Clinical Physiotherapist, Director: Pro Motion Physiotherapy, Osteo-Circuit, Canada; Carleen Lindsey, PT, MScAH, GCS, Bones, Backs and Balance, LLC, New Hartford, CT, USA; David J Armstrong, MD, FRCP(Edin), Consultant Rheumatologist and Clinical Lead for Osteoporosis & Fracture Liaison, Western Health and Social Care Trust, Londonderry, Northern Ireland; Debra Butt, MD, MSc, Associate Professor, University of Toronto, Toronto and Scarborough Health Network, Scarborough, Canada; Emma Clark, Professor, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England; Jenny Thain, MD, FRCP, Geriatrician, Assistant Professor, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Western University, London, Canada; Karen Barker, OBE, PhD, FCSP, Professor of physiotherapy, University of Oxford, Oxford, England; Palina Karakasidou, PT, OMT, MSc, MManipTher, PhD, Assistant Professor, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece; Phil Chilibeck, PhD, Professor, College of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada; Sarah Hardcastle, MBChB, BSc, MRCP (UK), PhD, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, England; Sharon Marr, BSc, MD, FRCPC, MED, Associate Professor, Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine University of Toronto & Medical Director of Seniors Health, St. Michael’s Hospital Department of Medicine and Providence Healthcare, Unity Health Toronto, Canada; Thomas Thierry, MD, Head of Rheumatology Department, St-Etienne University Hospital, St-Etienne, France; and Wendy Katzman, PT, DPTSc, OCS, Professor Emeritus, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA. Sixteen additional respondents did not specify that they wished to be named. The authors thank Angel Ong, PhD, RD, and Genevieve Mailhot, PhD, RD, Professor, Department of Nutrition, Université Montréal, Montréal, Canada, for reviewing the recommendations on nutrition. Sixteen additional panelists and one dietitian did not specify that they wished to be named.

Funding

This study was funded by the CIHR-IMHA Canadian Musculoskeletal Rehab Research Network (grant #: CIHR FRN: CFI-148081). We acknowledge the support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), CREATE 509950–2018 Training in Global Biomedical Technology Research and Innovation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Ponzano.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study received ethics approval from the University of Waterloo Research Ethics Board (ORE #43154).

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: In Boxes 2, 4, 5, and 6 of this article, the data were mistakenly listed in the wrong rows. The original article has been corrected.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 21 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 44 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ponzano, M., Tibert, N., Brien, S. et al. International consensus on the non-pharmacological and non-surgical management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 34, 1065–1074 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-023-06688-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-023-06688-9

Keywords

Navigation