Does stress matter?

References

1. Anastasiadi-Symeonidi, A.
   (2003) Reverse Dictionary of Modern Greek [Antistrofo Leksiko tis Neas Ellinikis] Thessaloniki: Institute of Modern Greek Studies/Manois Triantafyllidis Foundation [Institouto Neoellinikon Spoudon/Idrima Manoli Triantafyllidi].
   [Google Scholar]
2. Apostolouda, V.
   (2012) Nominal Stress in Greek: an experimental approach [O Tonismos ton Ousiastikon tis Ellinikis: mia peimatiki proseggisi]. (MA thesis), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Arciuli, J. , & Cupples, L.
   (2006) The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: Typicality effects and orthographic correlates. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(5), 920–948. doi:  10.1080/02724980443000782
   https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000782 [Google Scholar]
4. Arciuli, J. , & Cupples, L.
   (2007) Would you rather ‘embert a cudsert’ or ‘cudsert an embert’? How spelling patterns at the beginning of English disyllables can cue grammatical category. In A. C. Schalley & D. Khlentzos (Eds.), Mental states, Volume 2: Language and cognitive structure. (pp.213–238). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/slcs.93.12arc
   https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.93.12arc [Google Scholar]
5. Baayen, R. H. , Davidson, D. J. , & Bates, D. M.
   (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 [Google Scholar]
6. Baayen, R. H. , & Millin, P.
   (2010) Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(3), 12–28. 10.21500/20112084.807
   https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.807 [Google Scholar]
7. Balota, D. A. , Aschenbrenner, A. J. , & Yap, M. J.
   (2013) Additive effects of word frequency and stimulus Quality: the influence of trial history and data transformations. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 39(5), 1563–1571. doi:  10.1037/a0032186
   https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032186 [Google Scholar]
8. Balota, D. A. , Cortese, M. J. , Sergent-Marshall, S. D. , Spieler, D. H. , & Yap, M. J.
   (2004) Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 283–316. doi:  10.1037/0096‑3445.133.2.283
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283 [Google Scholar]
9. Balota, D. A. , Yap, M. J. , Hutchison, K. A. , & Cortese, M. J.
   (2012) Megastudies: What do millions (or so) of trials tell us about lexical processing?Visual word recognition: Models and methods, orthography and phonology, Vol. 1 (pp.90–115). New York, NY, US: Psychology Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bates, D. , Mächler, M. , Bolker, B. , & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
11. Browman, C. P.
    (1978) Tip of the tongue and slip of the ear : implications for language processing. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 42.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Brown, R. , & McNeill, D.
    (1966) The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5(4), 325–337. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(66)80040‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(66)80040-3 [Google Scholar]
13. Burzio, L.
    (1994) Principles of English Stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519741
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519741 [Google Scholar]
14. Butterworth, B.
    (1983) Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language Production (pp.257–294). London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bybee, J. L.
    (1995) Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(5), 425–455. 10.1080/01690969508407111
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407111 [Google Scholar]
16. Chitiri, H.-F. , & Willows, D. M.
    (1994) Word recognition in two languages and orthographies: English and Greek. Memory & Cognition, 22(3), 313–325. doi:  10.3758/BF03200859
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200859 [Google Scholar]
17. Cohen, J. , MacWhinney, B. , Flatt, M. , & Provost, J.
    (1993) PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25(2), 257–271. 10.3758/BF03204507
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204507 [Google Scholar]
18. Cooper, N. , Cutler, A. , & Wales, R.
    (2002) Constraints of Lexical Stress on Lexical Access in English: evidence from native and non-native listeners. Language and Speech, 45(3), 207–228. 10.1177/00238309020450030101
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309020450030101 [Google Scholar]
19. Cortese, M. J. , & Khanna, M. M.
    (2007) Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables. An analysis of 2,342 words, 60(8), 1072–1082. doi:  10.1080/17470210701315467
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701315467 [Google Scholar]
20. Cutler, A.
    (1980) Errors of stress and intonation. In V. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance : slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand (pp.67–80). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cutler, A.
    (1986) Forbear is a homophone: Lexical prosody does not constrain lexical Access. Language and Speech, 29(3), 201–220. 10.1177/002383098602900302
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098602900302 [Google Scholar]
22. Cutler, A. , & Clifton, C.
    (1984) The use of prosodic information in word recognition. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X : control of language processes (pp.183–196). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Cutler, A. , & Foss, D. J.
    (1977) On the role of sentence stress in sentence processing. Language and Speech, 20(1), 1–10. 10.1177/002383097702000101
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097702000101 [Google Scholar]
24. Dufour, S.
    (2008) Phonological priming in auditory word recognition: When both controlled and automatic processes are responsible for the effects. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 62(1), 33–41. 10.1037/1196‑1961.62.1.33
    https://doi.org/10.1037/1196-1961.62.1.33 [Google Scholar]
25. Dumay, N. , Benraïss, A. , Barriol, B. , Colin, C. , Radeau, M. , & Besson, M.
    (2001) Behavioral and electrophysiological study of phonological priming between bisyllabic spoken words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(1), 121–143. 10.1162/089892901564117
    https://doi.org/10.1162/089892901564117 [Google Scholar]
26. Ferrand, L. , Brysbaert, M. , Keuleers, E. , New, B. , Bonin, P. , Méot, A. , … Pallier, C.
    (2011) Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking: evidence from Chronolex. Frontiers in psychology, 2, 306–306. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00306
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00306 [Google Scholar]
27. Institute of Modern Greek Studies (Manolis Trantafylliidis Foundation) [Institouto Neoellinikon Spoudon (Manolis Triantafyllidis Foundation)] (1998) Dictionary of Standard Modern Greek [Lexiko tis Koinis Neoellinikis], Thessaloniki: Aristotle University.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Fowler, C. A. , Napps, S. E. , & Feldman, L.
    (1985) Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory & Cognition, 13(3), 241–255. 10.3758/BF03197687
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197687 [Google Scholar]
29. Fromkin, V. A.
    (1973) Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Gagné, C. L. , & Spalding, T. L.
    (2009) Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures?Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 20–35. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2008.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.07.003 [Google Scholar]
31. Gow, D. W. , & Gordon, P. C.
    (1993) Coming to terms with stress: Effects of stress location in sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22(6), 545–578. doi:  10.1007/BF01072936
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01072936 [Google Scholar]
32. Hatzigeorgiu, N. , Spiliotopoulou, A. , Vacalopoulou, A. , Papakostopoulou, A. , Piperidis, S. , Gavriilidou, M. , & Karagiannis, G.
    (2001) National Thesaurus of Hellenic Texts (NTHL): Online Modern Greek Corpus [Ethikos Thisavros Ellinikon Keimenon (ETHEG): Soma Keimenon Tis Neas Ellinikis Sto Diadiktio]. Studies in Greek Linguistics, 21, 812–821.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Jarema, G. , Busson, C. , Nikolova, R. , Tsapkini, K. , & Libben, G.
    (1999) Processing compounds: a cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language, 68(1), 362–369. doi:  10.1006/brln.1999.2088
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2088 [Google Scholar]
34. Jesse, A. , Poellmann, K. , & Kong, Y.-Y.
    (2017) English listeners use suprasegmental cues to lexical stress early during spoken-word recognition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR, 60(1), 190–198. 10.1044/2016_JSLHR‑H‑15‑0340
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-15-0340 [Google Scholar]
35. Kappa, I.
    (2002) On the acquisition of syllabic structure in Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 3(1), 1–52. doi:  10.1075/jgl.3.03kap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jgl.3.03kap [Google Scholar]
36. Kehayia, E. , Jarema, G. , Tsapkini, K. , Perlak, D. , Ralli, A. , & Kadzielawa, D.
    (1999) The Role of morphological structure in the processing of compounds: The interface between linguistics and psycholinguistics. Brain and Language, 68(1), 370–377. doi:  10.1006/brln.1999.2090
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2090 [Google Scholar]
37. Kehoe, M. , & Stoel-Gammon, C.
    (1997) Truncation patterns in English-speaking children’s word productions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40(3), 526–541. doi:  10.1044/jslhr.4003.526
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4003.526 [Google Scholar]
38. Kelly, M. H.
    (2004) Word onset patterns and lexical stress in English. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(3), 231–244. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2003.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2003.12.002 [Google Scholar]
39. Kelly, M. H. , Morris, J. , & Verrekia, L.
    (1998) Orthographic cues to lexical stress: Effects on naming and lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 26(4), 822–832. doi:  10.3758/BF03211401
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211401 [Google Scholar]
40. Kiparsky, P.
    (1982) Lexical morphology and phonology. In T. L. S. O. Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Selected papers from SICOL-1981 (pp.4–91). Seoul: Hanshin.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Kohn, S. E. , & Smith, K. L.
    (2008) Distinctions between two phonological output deficits. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15(1), 75–95. 10.1017/S0142716400006986
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400006986 [Google Scholar]
42. Kuznetsova, A. , Brockhoff, P. B. , & Christensen, R. H. B.
    (2017) lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 26. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
43. Lehtonen, M. , Niska, H. , Wande, E. , Niemi, J. , & Laine, M.
    (2006) Recognition of inflected words in a morphologically limited language: Frequency effects in monolinguals and bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(2), 121–146. 10.1007/s10936‑005‑9008‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-005-9008-1 [Google Scholar]
44. Libben, G.
    (1998) Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: consequences for representation, processing, and impairment. Brain and Language, 61(1), 30–44. 10.1006/brln.1997.1876
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1876 [Google Scholar]
45. Libben, G.
    (2006) Why study compound processing? An overview of the issues. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The Representation and Processing of Compound Words (pp.1–22). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Libben, G. , Derwing, B. L. , & de Almeida, R. G.
    (1999) Ambiguous novel compounds and models of morphological parsing. Brain and Language, 68(1), 378–386. 10.1006/brln.1999.2093
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2093 [Google Scholar]
47. Lorch, R. F. , Balota, D. A. , & Stamm, E. G.
    (1986) Locus of inhibition effects in the priming of lexical decisions: pre- or postlexical access?Memory & Cognition, 14(2), 95–103. doi:  10.3758/BF03198369
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198369 [Google Scholar]
48. Malikouti-Drachman, A. , & Drachman, G.
    (1989) Tonismos sta Ellinika [Stress in Greek]. Studies in Greek Linguistics (9), 127–143.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Marelli, M. , Gagné, C. L. , & Spalding, T. L.
    (2017) Compounding as abstract operation in semantic space: Investigating relational effects through a large-scale, data-driven computational model. Cognition, 166, 207–224. doi:  10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.026
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.026 [Google Scholar]
50. Marslen-Wilson, W. , Tyler, L. K. , Waksler, R. , & Older, L.
    (1994) Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 3–33. 10.1037/0033‑295X.101.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.3 [Google Scholar]
51. Marslen-Wilson, W. , Zhou, X. , & Ford, M.
    (1997) Morphology, modality, and lexical architecture. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1996 (pp.117–134). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3718‑0_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3718-0_8 [Google Scholar]
52. Mcqueen, J. M. , & Sereno, J.
    (2005) Cleaving automatic processes from strategic biases in phonological priming. Memory & Cognition, 33(7), 1185–1209. doi:  10.3758/BF03193222
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193222 [Google Scholar]
53. Nakatani, L. H. , & Schaffer, J. A.
    (1978) Hearing ’’words’’ without words: Prosodic cues for word perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63(1), 234–245. 10.1121/1.381719
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381719 [Google Scholar]
54. Napps, S. E.
    (1989) Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships?Memory & Cognition, 17(6), 729–739. doi:  10.3758/BF03202634
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202634 [Google Scholar]
55. Nespor, M. , & Ralli, A.
    (1994) Stress domains in Greek compounds: A case of morphology-phonology interaction. In I. Philippaki-Warburton , K. Nicolaidis & M. Sifianou (Eds.), Themes in Greek Linguistics: Papers from the First International Conference on Greek Linguistics, Reading, September 1993 (pp.201–208). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.117.29nes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.117.29nes [Google Scholar]
56. Nespor, M. , & Ralli, A.
    (1996) Morphology-phonology interface: Phonological domains in Greek compounds. The Linguistic Review, 13(3–4), 357–382.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Norris, D. , McQueen, J. M. , & Cutler, A.
    (2002) Bias effects in facilitatory phonological priming. Memory & Cognition, 30(3), 399–411. doi:  10.3758/BF03194940
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194940 [Google Scholar]
58. Ota, M.
    (2006) Input frequency and word truncation in child Japanese: structural and lexical effects. Language and Speech, 49(2), 261–294. doi:  10.1177/00238309060490020601
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309060490020601 [Google Scholar]
59. Petrounias, E.
    (2002) Neoellinikí grammatikí kai sigkritikí análisi : Tomos A: Fonitikí kai eisagogí sti fonología [Modern Greek grammar and comparative analysis, Vol. A: Phonetics and introduction to phonology]. Thessaloniki: Ziti.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Plag, I. , Kunter, G. , & Lappe, S.
    (2007) Testing hypotheses about compound stress assignment in English: a corpus-based investigationCorpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory (Vol.3, pp.199). 10.1515/CLLT.2007.012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/CLLT.2007.012 [Google Scholar]
61. Plag, I. , Kunter, G. , Lappe, S. , & Braun, M.
    (2008) The role of semantics, argument structure, and lexicalization in compound stress assignment in English. Language, 84(4), 760–794. 10.1353/lan.0.0072
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0072 [Google Scholar]
62. Protopapas, A.
    (2006) On the Use and Usefulness of Stress Diacritics in Reading Greek. Reading and Writing, 19(2), 171–198. doi:  10.1007/s11145‑005‑4023‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4023-z [Google Scholar]
63. Protopapas, A. , Gerakaki, S. , & Alexandri, S.
    (2006) Lexical and default stress assignment in reading Greek. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(4), 418–432. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9817.2006.00316.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00316.x [Google Scholar]
64. Protopapas, A. , Gerakaki, S. , & Alexandri, S.
    (2007) Sources of information for stress assignment in reading Greek. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(4), 695–720. doi:  10.1017/S0142716407070373
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070373 [Google Scholar]
65. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved fromhttps://www.R-project.org
    [Google Scholar]
66. Radeau, M. , Morais, J. , & Segui, J.
    (1995) Phonological priming between monosyllabic spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(6), 1297–1311. 10.1037/0096‑1523.21.6.1297
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.6.1297 [Google Scholar]
67. Ralli, A.
    (2000) A feature-based analysis of Greek nominal inflection. Glossologia, 11–12, 201–227.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Ralli, A.
    (2007) I Sinthesi ton lekseon [Compounding of words]. Athina: Pattakis.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Ralli, A.
    (2013) Compounding in Modern Greek. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑4960‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4960-3 [Google Scholar]
70. Ralli, A. , & Tourantzidis, L.
    (1992) Computational processing of stress in Modern Greek [Ipologistiki Epeksergasia touTonismou tis Neas Ellinikis]. Studies in Greek Linguistics, 12, 273–289.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Revithiadou, A.
    (1999) Headmost accent wins : head dominance and ideal prosodic form in lexical accent systems. (PhD Diss.), Universiteit Leiden, The Hague.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Revithiadou, A. , & Lengeris, A.
    (2016) One or many? In search of the default stress in Greek. In H. van der Hulst , J. Heinz & R. Goedemans (Eds.), Dimensions of Phonological Stress (pp.263–290). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316212745.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316212745.010 [Google Scholar]
73. Sandra, D.
    (1990) On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 42(3), 529–567. 10.1080/14640749008401236
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749008401236 [Google Scholar]
74. Schreuder, R. , & Baayen, R. H.
    (1995) Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing. (pp.131–154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Slowiaczek, L. M. , McQueen, J. M. , Soltano, E. G. , & Lynch, M.
    (2000) Phonological representations in prelexical speech processing: Evidence from form-based priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(3), 530–560. doi:  10.1006/jmla.2000.2710
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2710 [Google Scholar]
76. Slowiaczek, L. M. , Nusbaum, H. C. , & Pisoni, D. B.
    (1987) Phonological priming in auditory word recognition. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 13(1), 64–75. 10.1037/0278‑7393.13.1.64
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.13.1.64 [Google Scholar]
77. Spinelli, E. , Segui, J. , & Radeau, M.
    (2001) Phonological priming in spoken word recognition with bisyllabic targets. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16(4), 367–392. doi:  10.1080/01690960042000111
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960042000111 [Google Scholar]
78. Stanners, R. F. , Neiser, J. J. , Hernon, W. P. , & Hall, R.
    (1979) Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(4), 399–412. doi:  10.1016/S0022‑5371(79)90219‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90219-6 [Google Scholar]
79. Taft, M. , & Forster, K. I.
    (1976) Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15(6), 607–620. 10.1016/0022‑5371(76)90054‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5371(76)90054-2 [Google Scholar]
80. Tsapkini, K. , Kehayia, E. , & Jarema, G.
    (1999) Does phonological change play a role in the recognition of derived forms across modalities?Brain and Language, 68(1), 318–323. doi:  10.1006/brln.1999.2113
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2113 [Google Scholar]
81. Tzakosta, M.
    (2009) Perceptual ambiguities in the formation of Greek compounds by native speakers. In G. K. Giannakis , M. Baltazani , G. I. Xydopoulos & T. Tsangalidis (Eds.), E-proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Greek Linguistics (8ICGL). Department of Philology: University of Ioannina.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Tzakosta, M.
    (2011) L1 transfer in L2 learning: compound forms in the speech of Turkish learners of Greek. In E. Kitis , N. Lavidas , N. Topintzi & T. Tsangalidis (Eds.), Selected papers from the 19th International Symposium on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics (pp.459–468). Department of English Studies: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Tzakosta, M. , & Mamadaki, M.
    (2013) Compound formation in L2 learning: the case of Bulgarian, Romanian and Russian learners of Greek. In Z. Gavriilidou , A. Efthymiou , E. Thomadaki & P. Kambakis-Vougiouklis (Eds.), The E-Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of Greek Linguistics (pp.578–583). Komotini: Dimocritus University of Thrace.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Zharkova, N.
    (2005) Strategies in the acquisition of segments and syllables in Russian-speaking children. Leiden Papers in Linguistics, Special issue on Developmental Paths in Phonological Acquisition. M. Tzakosta , C. Levelt & J. van de Weijer (Eds). 2.1, 189–213.
    [Google Scholar]