Selected Publications

An up to date list of Dr. Lubarsky's publications is available here.

*Reiter-Campeau S, Lubarsky S, Chalk CH, et al. 2023. Education research: Qualitative assessment of virtual teaching of the neurological examination to students reveals importance of technique, process, and documentation. Neurology Education. 2(3).

*Szpindel A, Rahman T, Bouhadoun S, Lubarsky S, Moore F. 2023. Temporary adaptations or new (virtual) reality? Applying to residency during a pandemic. Canadian Journal of Neurological Science. 50(2):163-164. *Invited Commentary*

Lubarsky S. Foreword: Approach to… developing illness scripts. 2021. McGill Journal of Medicine. 19(2):ii-iii. *Invited Commentary*

Leclerc AA, Nguyen L, Charlin B, Lubarsky S, Ayad T. 2021. Assessing acceptability of the script concordance test: A Nationwide Study in Otolaryngology. Canadian journal of Surgery. 26;64(3):E317-E323.

Lubarsky S, Thomas A. 2020. Thinking inside the box: Using old tools to solve new problems in virtual learning. Medical Education. 55(1):108-111 *Invited Commentary*

Moore F, Buyukkurt A, Bouhadoun S, Lubarsky S. 2020. Don’t make the best of it, make it better: Matching medical students to residency programs in the time of Covid-19. Can J Neuro Sci, Oct 20:1-7 e-pub ahead of print. *Invited Commentary*

Lubarsky S. 2020. Medical Education Adaptations: Movie night! An entertaining online educational method for introducing students to common presentations in neurology. Medical Education. 54(9):856-857.

Young ME, Thomas A, Lubarsky S, et al. 2020. Mapping clinical reasoning literature across the health professions: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. 20(1):107.

Thomas A, Lubarsky S, Varpio L, Durning S, Young M. 2020. Scoping reviews in health professions education: Challenges, considerations and lessons learned about epistemology and methodology. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 25(4):989-1002.

Charlin B, Deschenes MF, Dumas JP, Lecours J, Vincent AM, Kassis J, Guertin L, Gagnon R, Robert D, Foucault A, Lubarsky S, Fernandez F. 2019. Concevoir une formation par concordance pour developer le raisonnement professionnel: quelles étapes faut-il parcourir? (Designing a learning by concordance tool to develop professional reasoning skills: What are the steps to follow?) Pédagogie Médicale. 19(3):143-149.

Hutchison T, Snell L, Wiseman J, Lubarsky S. 2019. Really Good Stuff: Applying adaptive expertise for students’ clinical decision making. Medical Education. 53(11):1141-1142.

Pelaccia T, Plotnick L, Audetat MC, Nendaz M, Lubarsky S, Torabi N, Thomas A, Young M, Dory V. 2019. A scoping review of physicians’ clinical reasoning in emergency departments. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 75(2):206-217.

Young M, Thomas A, Gordon D, Gruppen L, Lubarsky S, et al. 2019. The terminology of clinical reasoning in health professions education: Implications and considerations. Medical Teacher. 41(11):1277-1284.

*Bacchi S, Tan I, Chim I, Dabarno-Anacleto M, Lubarsky S, Duggan P. (2019). Script concordance test examinations: Student perception and study approaches. Focus on Health Professional Education. 20(2):xxx.

Daniel M, Rencic J, Durning SJ, Santen S, Lang V, Gordon D, Heist B, Ratcliffe T, Lubarsky S, Estrada C, Holmboe E, Ballard T, Artino A, Hart A, Da Silva A, Cleary T, Stojan J, Gruppen LD. 2019. Clinical reasoning assessment methods. A scoping review and practical guidance. Academic Medicine. 94(6):902-912.

Dory V, Allan K, Birnbaum L, Lubarsky S, Pickering J, Young M. 2019. AM Last Page: Ensuring the quality of multiple choice tests: an algorithm to facilitate decision making for difficult questions. Academic Medicine. 94(5):740.

*Fletcher A, Chen B, Benrimoh D, Shemie S, Lubarsky S. 2018. Lessons learned from a student-driven initiative to design and implement an Organ and Tissue Donation course across Canadian medical schools. Perspectives in Medical Education. 7(5):332-336.

Young M, Dory V, Lubarsky S, Thomas A. 2018. AM Last Page: How different theories of clinical reasoning influence teaching and assessment. Academic Medicine. 93(9):1415.

Lubarsky S, Dory V, Meterissian S, Lambert C, Gagnon R. 2018. Examining the effects of gaming and guessing on script concordance test scores. Perspectives in Medical Education. 7(3):174-181.

Young M, Thomas A, Lubarsky S, et al. 2018. Drawing the Boundaries: The difficulty in defining clinical reasoning. Academic Medicine. 93(7):990-995.

Lubarsky S, Dory V, Audetat MC, Custers EJFM, Charlin B. 2015. Using script theory to cultivate illness script formation and diagnostic reasoning in health professions education. Canadian Medical Education Journal. 6(2): e61-e70.

Durning S, Lubarsky S, Torre D, Dory V, Holmboe E. 2015. Considering ‘nonlinearity’ in medical education assessment: Supporting theory, practice, and future research directions. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 35(3):232–243.

Lubarsky S, Durning S, Charlin B. 2014. AM Last Page: The Script Concordance Test: A tool for assessing clinical data interpretation under conditions of uncertainty. Academic Medicine. 89(7); 1089.

Audétat MC, Lubarsky S, Blais JG, Charlin B. 2013. Clinical Reasoning: Where Do We Stand on Identifying and Remediating Difficulties? Creative Education. Vol 4, No. 6A, 42-48.

Lubarsky S, Gagnon R, Charlin B. 2013. Commentary: Scoring the Script Concordance Test: Not a black-and-white issue. Medical Education. 47(12):1159-61.

Lubarsky S, Dory V, Duggan P, Gagnon R, Charlin B. 2013. Script concordance testing: From theory to practice: AMEE guide No. 75. Medical Teacher. 35(3):184-93.

Lubarsky S, Gagnon R, Charlin B. 2012. Commentary: Script Concordance Test item response process: the argument for probability versus typicality. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 17:11-13.

Charlin B, Lubarsky S, Millette B, et al. 2012. Clinical reasoning processes: unraveling complexity through graphical representation. Medical Education. 46(5):454-463.

Lubarsky S, Charlin B, Cook DA, Chalk, C & van der Vleuten C. 2011. Script concordance testing: A review of published validity evidence. Medical Education. 45(4): 329-338.

Gagnon R, Lubarsky S, Lambert C, Charlin B. 2011. Optimization of answer keys for script concordance testing: should we exclude deviant respondents, deviant responses, or neither? Advances in Health Sciences Education. 16(5): 601-608.

Charlin B, Gagnon R, Lubarsky S, Lambert C, Meterissian S, Chalk C, Goudreau J, van der Vleuten C. 2010. Assessment in the context of uncertainty using the script concordance test: More meaning for scores. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 22(3): 180-186.

Lubarsky S, Chalk C, Kazitani D, Gagnon R, Charlin B. 2009. The Script Concordance Test: A new tool assessing clinical judgment in neurology. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences. 36(3): 326-331.

 

 

Back to top