Administration and Procedure

The course evaluation procedure described respects the Senate policy on end-of-term course evaluations, approved on 23 April 2014.

On this page:

Getting Started | Preparation of Course Evaluation Questionnaires
Setting Up Course Evaluations in Mercury | Completion of Course Evaluations
Availability of Results | Dissemination of Results

Getting Started

  1. Each academic unit (department, School or Faculty if there are no departments) will have at least one individual designated as the Mercury Departmental Liaison. The liaison(s) will coordinate the unit’s course evaluations and will be the contact for all communications with the [at] (TLS Mercury system administrator). In addition, each unit must have a designated backup person. The academic unit head should send the name(s), McGill ID(s) and contact information for the Mercury liaison(s) and backups to the [at] (TLS Mercury system administrator). NOTE: Mercury Departmental Liaison(s) and backups will have access to confidential course evaluation results and may not use this information in an unauthorized manner.

    Responsibility of Mercury Liaison(s):

    • identify the courses to be evaluated

    • create the online course evaluations

    • relay information provided by the TLS Mercury system administrator to instructors

    • remind instructors when evaluations are available to students and monitor response rates

    • convey updated information, concerns/issues to the TLS Mercury system administrator

Preparation of Course Evaluation Questionnaires

  1. Each Faculty will determine whether a Faculty-wide questionnaire will be used, for the different course types, e.g., lectures and labs. If yes, the Dean or delegate should submit the default questionnaires with a message to that effect. If an individual academic unit creates its own questionnaire(s), then the Mercury Liaison should send the defaults to the [at] (TLS Mercury system administrator) after receiving any required Faculty approvals. Once approved, the default questionnaire cannot be edited by the Mercury Liaison or the instructor. For information on how to design questionnaires, please refer to the course evaluation questionnaire/sample templates site or consult with a member of tls [at] (Teaching and Learning Services). If in subsequent years, the unit (department, School or Faculty) wishes to revise the default questionnaire, the Mercury Liaison should contact the TLS Mercury system administrator. Note that any changes must be approved by the academic unit head and Faculty administrators, as required.

  2. Each course evaluation questionnaire must include the four core questions as stated in the Policy, and may include up to 21 additional questions. The course evaluation questionnaire for each course should not exceed 25 questions. It is suggested that each academic unit select from the bank of recommended of questions when designing their course evaluations. Alternatively, each academic unit may choose to develop up to 21 questions of their own. (See Policy)

  3. Default course evaluation questionnaires can be created in more than one language if the academic unit provides a translated version(s) to the [at] (TLS Mercury system administrator). Students would then be able to select the language of the course evaluation questionnaire.

  4. Individual instructors are able to customize their course evaluations by adding up to three (3) questions. Instructors should fill out this form so that the questions are added to the appropriate course evaluation questionnaire. Note that neither instructors nor academic units can modify or delete questions from the default course evaluation questionnaires.

Setting Up Course Evaluations in Mercury

  1. At the beginning of each term, the [at] (TLS Mercury system administrator) will provide the following information to all Mercury Departmental Liaisons:

    • the dates of the evaluation periods when Mercury will be available to students for course evaluation completion, and

    • the deadline for setting up the course evaluations.

  2. The default course evaluation period (for regularly scheduled courses) will be the same across the University. The time period normally runs for approximately six (6) weeks and ends no later than two days after the end of the examination period. These dates will be indicated on the Mercury system page.

  3. Academic Units, with the prior approval of the Dean, may change the closing date of the evaluation period for all its courses to the day before the start of the examination period and thus shorten the evaluation period to approximately three (3) weeks. (See Policy).

  4. For courses that do not follow the regular term calendar, the individual questionnaires will have customized start and end dates for the evaluation period. The Mercury Departmental Liaison manages the customization process.

  5. All information about teaching assignments (instructors and teaching assistants) is taken directly from Banner and must be complete and correct before the Mercury Liaison creates the course evaluations. If there is missing or incorrect information, it needs to be updated in Banner (SSASECT form) before proceeding. All courses that are active and have an enrolment above zero will be listed on the Mercury department page. The Liaison selects the courses to be evaluated; note that according to the policy, all courses with five (5) or more students shall be evaluated. (See Policy)

Completing Course Evaluations


  1. The University manages several reminder mechanisms during the course evaluation periods. Please note: For course evaluated outside of the default evaluation period, similar communication strategies are used; however, the frequency may be different.

    • Pop-up windows also appear when logging into Minerva.

    • There are reminders on the McGill, TLS, Student Information, myMcGill and myCourses home pages.

    • A number of email messages are sent on behalf of the Deputy Provost (Student Life and Learning) to all students encouraging them to complete their evaluations.

  2. Instructors, academic units and student associations are encouraged to discuss the importance of course evaluations with students. (See the list of "suggested" strategies to encourage student participation for online course evaluations: for instructors, unit heads, teaching assistants, student leaders).


  1. Students access their course evaluations by logging into their MINERVA account. They can then either follow the prompt in the pop-up window OR from the Student Menu: click on Mercury Online Course Evaluation Menu and then Submit your course evaluations.

  2. Each evaluation may be completed only once and cannot be changed after submission. Therefore, once a questionnaire has been submitted, it will no longer be available to the student.

  3. If a statement is not applicable or the student does not have a definite opinion on the ranking, the "Not Applicable" option (if available) should be selected or the question should be left unanswered.


  1. Student responses are completely anonymous and confidential. Student ID numbers are NOT linked to their responses. ID numbers are saved in a separate database only to record completion; they are not available to the instructor or academic unit at any time for any reason.

  2. To guarantee that all responses are anonymous, partially completed questionnaires cannot be saved for later completion. Once a course evaluation is begun, there cannot be more than 30 minutes of inactivity or all data will be lost. Students should be advised not to include their name or their student number in any part of the course evaluation to avoid inadvertently compromising their anonymity. Instructors, the Mercury Liaison, and the academic unit head can monitor the response rate during the evaluation period and remind students if they wish. For courses evaluated outside of the default or condensed course evaluation period (i.e.: intensive courses), it is strongly recommended that instructors, the Mercury Liaison, and/or the academic unit head communicate with students and closely monitor the response rate to encourage participation.

  3. If an instructor arranges for the course evaluation to be administered in the classroom (using laptops) or a computer lab, then the instructor must leave the room or lab while students are completing the evaluations.

Availability of Course Evaluation Results

  1. Course evaluation results, both responses to the numerical questions and any student comments, are available to the instructor(s), academic unit heads and Mercury Departmental Liaison after the final grades for a course have been submitted and processed. Departmental summaries are only available at the end of each term. Course evaluation results can be downloaded from Mercury for subsequent analysis.

  2. For multi-instructor courses, the system automatically duplicates all of the instructor-related questions for each instructor assigned to the course in Banner. This means that students can provide specific feedback on multiple instructors while answering course-related questions only once. All course instructors have access to the results of the course questions, but individual instructors only have access to the results of their instructor-related questions.

  3. Cross-listed courses are two or more courses, from the same or different departments, that have different course numbers (CRNs) but are taught together and function as one course. Although a course evaluation is created for each course number (CRN), the system combines the evaluation results and reports them as one course for confidentiality reasons as they may be only one or two students enrolled in one of the CRNs.

  4. If the Mercury Liaison or academic unit head downloads the results and stores them electronically, they should be either in an external memory format stored in a locked cabinet or in a secure on-line location.

Dissemination of Course Evaluation Results to the McGill Community

  1. All instructors should use the online permission form to grant or deny permission for the numerical responses to their course evaluation questions to be made available to McGill students, faculty and authorized administrators). Note that providing students with access to results is one way to increase response rates. If an instructor does not object to access, and if the response rates meet the thresholds mentioned below, the numerical results will be available to the McGill communtiy on Minerva/Mercury. Instructors may provide comments to accompany the posted results to provide contextual information.

  2. In multi-instructor courses, all instructors must not object to access for the numerical data from that course’s evaluation results to be disseminated. Permission may be granted or denied for all courses. In that case, the decision is applied going forward although it may be changed if the instructor wishes. Permission may also be granted on a course-by-course basis.

  3. No written comments are disseminated. Re-appointment, tenure and promotion committees may consider written comments only as submitted by the candidate. (See Policy statement #18)

  4. The dissemination form is displayed below the Course List. Deadlines and instructions for instructors on how to register a permission decision are available here.

  5. Numerical course evaluation results will be disseminated by term and the McGill community should have access to five (5) previous academic years. Consult this page for the schedule when course evaluation results become available to the McGill community. .

  6. Results will only be disseminated to the McGill community if the response rates indicated below are achieved:

Class size Response rate (%)
< 5 no evaluation conducted
5-11 minimum 5 responses
12-30 at least 40%
31-100 at least 35%
101-200 at least 30%
201 or more at least 25%

Any questions and/or comments should be addressed to the [at] (TLS Mercury system administrator).

McGill University is located on land which has long served as a site of meeting and exchange amongst Indigenous peoples, including the Haudenosaunee and Anishinabeg nations. McGill honours, recognizes and respects these nations as the traditional stewards of the lands and waters on which we meet today.