Evidence-based Teaching Strategies: Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Resources
Relevant QEP POLs for Secondary Cycle 1
Distinguishes between renewable and non-renewable energy resources (e.g. Sun, molten rock, moving water, oil)
Assessment Item(s) to explore/uncover preconceptions around this concepts (select from the diagnostic items table)
In Québec, the need for electricity has increased. To keep up with the need, new power plants that respect the environment must be built. Which of the following types of power plants uses a renewable energy resource?
A. Coal-burning power plant
B. Diesel power plant
C. Wind power plant
D. Nuclear power plant
(Adapted Item, BIM Cycle 1 (Renewable Energy Resources: from BIM Disc September 2007 Volume 77 Cycle 1)
Evidence-based Teaching Strategies to Promote Student Engagement and Conceptual Understanding in Science
Activities to promote conceptual change about global warming |
|
Article title |
Climate of concern – a search for effective strategies for teaching children about global warming |
Citation |
Taber, F., & Taylor, N. (2009). Climate of concern – a search for effective strategies for teaching children about global warming. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 4(2), 97–116. |
The purpose of Taber’s and Taylor’s article (2009) was to explore the intuitive ideas that primary students have about global warming, and to then determine if teacher interventions can improve students understanding of global warming. Summary of 8 Week Lesson that was proposed in this article included a variety of interesting and concrete activities from students’ daily lives to encourage them to understand the concept global warming in their real life contexts and activities.
In this lesson, evaluation involved a pre and post test. Taber and Taylor (2009) found that although there was no dramatic improvement in knowledge, that the number of misconceptions was fewer. The study found that students tended to group all environmental issues as one (global warming, rising sea levels, air and water pollution). Improvements were found in student understanding of global warming. |
Activities to promote systems thinking through inquiry-based approaches to teaching science |
|
Article title |
Learning by conceptual modeling – changes in knowledge structure and content. |
Citation |
Kitek A., Poppe M., Stelzhammer M., Muhar S., & Bredeweg B. (2013). Learning by conceptual modeling – changes in knowledge structure and content. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 6(3), 217–227. |
Kitek and colleagues (2013) proposed to assess the impact of the DynaLearn interactive learning environment (ILE) on student acquisition of conceptual knowledge of how and why environmental systems behave as they do. The ILE engages learners in modeling to improve understanding of how systems work. Two systems were studied, with the following questions:
DynaLearn allows students to explore three representations:
Students worked on assignments in conjunction with the DynaLearn software for two three-day sessions. DynaLearn induced causal and interlinked understanding of environmental systems. An example how to reduce the negative effects of radioactive iodine uptake upon the thyroid. |
Activities to promote conceptual change through various text structures |
|
Article title |
Reading about energy: The effects of text structure in science learning and conceptual change |
Citation |
Diakidoy, I., Kendeou P., & Ioannides C. (2003). Reading about energy: The effects of text structure in science learning and conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 335–356. |
Diakidoy and colleagues (2003) compares science learning using refutational texts (texts where misconceptions are stated and then explicitly refuted) compared to learning using expository texts (texts where the primary function is to inform. They are characterized by large amounts of unfamiliar information). The study investigated how acquisition of the concept of energy differed between sixth-grade students using the two types of texts. The refutational text group outperformed the expositiory text group in the acquisition of counterintuitive science concepts, with an emphasis on the distinctions between the concepts of force and energy. Students displayed a higher ability to verbally distinguish the difference between energy and force in conversational settings. Material required for this lesson is refutational texts focusing on energy and force. Evaluation consisted of a pen and paper test to assess the acquisition of the instructed concepts (energy: forms, transformations & sources). A number of probing questions were used by the researchers to elicit students’ intuitive conceptions about energy, which other teachers could also use in their lessons on force and energy, such as what is energy? What is involved in lifting an object (force or energy)? How is energy used and replenished? What can we understand by using the concept of energy? Can we store the energy stored in wood or oil elsewhere? “What produces more energy: a fireplace or a lamp?”, “Do different foods have different amounts of energy?” Two identical cars are traveling on the highway. Car A is moving faster than Car B. Which car has more energy? |